This is a problem I reported months ago, but maybe it was overlooked among all my other gripes about the search.
 
Here's the problem...
 
1. Do a search that includes the word "photograph", anything likely to give more than one page of results, eg "Dog photograph". (Note, do not search for "Dog Photographs", plural, you won't get anything).
2. Try and get to the 2nd page of results. See a problem?
 
I'm sure anybody who has any cards with photographs on them (like all of mine) must be missing out on views.
Maybe there are other words that cause this problem, but this is the only one I have encountered.

Quote from Terry_151326 on Oct 11^th, 2012, 5:34am:

Useful huh?
Not too many of those results actually feature a sunrise either.

Will have the tech team look into it, thanks for the report.

I notice now that any search that includes the word "photograph" returns zero results.
Makes it fairer all round I suppose.  
 
Meanwhile, GCU clings on to the notion that a "photo card" is any card with a "custom front", whether or not the design is actually a photo or can be customised to include one.
 
Want a card with a photo of a waterfall on it? Try searching for "waterfall photo card". (Something a prospective buyer is quite likely to do I would have thought). You get but one result, which isn't even a photo, but a painting. It only shows up because it is a "custom front" design.
There's no shortage of cards with waterfalls on them. Search for "waterfall" and you get 2288 results, but 2287 of them will be invisible to anyone that searches for "waterfall photo", or "waterfall photo card".
 
It's ironic that artists are obligated to keyword their cards correctly, and put them in the right category etc, (having them sent back if they don't), yet the search function is fundamentally broken in so many areas.