That is adorable!!!  
 
I did a white rabbit about a year ago and it was accepted. I just had to remove any keywords that made reference to Alice in Wonderland. So I would think so.

I tested the tag on GCU. You can obviously use it.  
 
http://www.greetingcarduniverse.com/shopping/cb.asp?keyword=alice+in+wonderland& amp;button.x=0&button.y=0

I would argue if that happened...but you can see by the link there are plenty of AIW, tagged images on GCU.

Dear Reviewer 443 - again, though I understand what you are saying, the argument is moot:  
 
a. Disney does not OWN the image of blond girls in blue dresses. They simply can't for more reasons than I care to get into here (for one thing, you can't copyright color.) Disney ONLY owns their image of Alice. Even DIsney knows that. DIsney does not OWN the rights to ALice in WOnderland overall. They can't. Period.
 
b. On GCU there are nearly a dozen images of girls in blue dresses TAGGED Alice in Wonderland. I just tried it and provided the link. Some images are even NAMED ALICE IN WONDERLAND!  
If you were going to reject her image, then you'd need to go back and pull all those images that depict not just Alice (a blond girl in a blue dress) but all the Mad Hatter and March Hare & whatever else as well.  
 
I think the thing that irks me the most (and the reason I'm even persuing this stream) is that apparently the ALL the reviewers do not understand copyright and public domain issues and worse, that they don't know what's already on their own site.  
 
PS: Who is Reviewer 443 and why are they a NEWBIE?

Susan,
Reviewer 443 is a 'newbie' because the card review team has recently joined the forum in such discussions as a way for better communications between artists and reviewers. The designation 'newbie' refers only to the number of forum posts one makes. Reviewer 443 is NOT a 'newbie' to the review process.
 
I appreciate the review team working with us, and feel any disagreements should be put forward respectfully and any information for clarification presented in a helpful way, not demeaning the reviewers.
Just my opinion.
Pamela

Well I can see this is very contraversial...Not doing anything yet,, I will wait.. thank you.

I think (have to find it again) that the original Alice illustrations
are now public domain, Disney have never held the rights to Alice
just their own interpritation of Alice, they don't hold the colour
the dress nothing, just their particular drawing of her, I had a load
of free graphics when it went public, but ill see if I can find it all
it, the book itself is of course Copy write, but the illustratons
are not.......... but ill check the soures on that, I was going to use
her myself and I do have a lot of Alice works that are out there being
purchased  
 
Disney can't copy write the story, or the look the colour, similar to
anything Robin Hood, etc and so on, these are not Disney's to say
yes or no to they have no rights to Alice who is originally dressed
that way because that's what they wore them days...... and Alice
herself is always in those colours has been since what is it the middle
1800's? 1865 ish I think.
 
I think you could find a million thing's Disney uses that just aint theirs to own,
they only own their interpitations, I can list at least 20 Disney films that you  
could do your own interpritation on, if those images themselfs the originals are
in the domain.
 
I'ts like trying to copywrite Peter Pan they can't do that either  
or 100 Dalmations and the list could go on and on.
 
 
Tenniel died in 1914, so is comfortably in the public domain.
Similarly, according to the National Library of Scotland site, Maria
Kirk died in the 1930s, so is also in the public domain. Arthur
Rackham died in 1939, so is also in the public domain.
 
 
Tenniel being the or one of the original or early Illustrations.
 
You have to remember DISNEY own THEIR image of Alice
they do NOT or ever have had rights to the ORIGINAL interpritation
of Alice who is in a blue dress has blond hair, shoves herself down  
a rabbit hole etc, Disney BORROW things from old old stories, some folklaw
from Germany and the UK, in this case Scotland.. so as far as Disney goes
they would be right to copy write tinkerbell as you see her now in your mind
but If I made a fairy in green etc and all that and called it Tinkerbell Disney could
do nothing as they don't have rights to Tinkerbell herself (think this ones off limits anyway but just an example)